#ZOMBIE VS SKELETON 5E HOW TO#

#ZOMBIE VS SKELETON 5E HOW TO#

If so, does that mean that those able to retain the knowledge of how to fight instantly lose their flesh and become skelebobs? And if Zombies are zombies because they only remember how to feed, what happens when the flesh, well, decays completly? Do they just disappear? I'm not knocking your view, I just can't get my head around it. In response to that, the idea that skeletons are better than zombies because of what they were able to retain from their prior lives doesn't tally. Hope no one minded the D&D anology in this I just wanted to show gw isnt the only one who has zombies as the weaker of the two.

Personally I feel yes zombies should be weaker then skeletons, but that might be due to my years of playing D&d along with years of zombies being what they currently are with warhammer too. Where skeletons are free from that bond though most often skeleons are mentioned as the ancient dead from battles long past. Making them slow moving and uneffective in combat. as zombies indeed have padding but it is rotting flesh which hardens and slows them. I Personally feel this is a good intrepation of why gw did what they did. where the skeletons last far long.Unless a blunt weapon is present then it doesn't matter. I have seen zombies fall alot easier for most combatants use edged weapons ax's swords or even arrows. Using D&D 2nd edition for exampleĪ zombie is a 2 hd monster so total of 16 hp or hit point at mostĪ skeleton is 1 hd for a 8 hp or hit point but takes only half damage from edged weapons or arrows But popluar theroy on other games is the same.

I would say your right in a way with gw's interprtation. Hmm that reminds me of the D&D adventure this week end where the wizard with a broken leg ground zerod a fireball agiasnt a zombie ogre killing himself the zombie ogre, and severly wounding his two of his companion's.

Zombie vs skeleton 5e